Off The Telly » The Office http://www.offthetelly.co.uk Contemporary and classic British TV Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:07:07 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 The Office http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?p=4538 http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?p=4538#comments Sat, 27 Dec 2003 22:00:00 +0000 Ian Sparham http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?p=4538 I’m a bit wary of commenting on The Office, as it seems to be one of those programmes where only people who liked it from day one feel they are entitled to critique it. As it happens, at the beginning I hated it, loathing Ricky Gervais in advance. But gradually, it began to win me over and although I’m loathe to admit it, as everyone else began to jump onto the series I also started to really enjoy The Office.

This Christmas, then, I was surprised to find that The Office Christmas specials were the only programmes over the festive period that, for me, will leave any lasting impression. They made me laugh, made me punch the air when Brent told Finchy to “fuck off” and made me warm inside when Dawn and Tim got together after all.

It would have been terribly easy to carry on down the cynical “look at Brent – what a wanker” route to the bitter end, something which in my opinion was one of the problems with the second series of I’m Alan Partridge. The fact that the programme didn’t is to the credit of – yup – Ricky Gervais and co-creator Stephen Merchant. The fact that Gervais has discussed Brent in the context of Shakespeare has always suggested to me that he sees him as a “tragic” character, and that means he’s made up of three basic elements – a character flaw (insecurity), a moment of tragedy (his sacking) and a moment of redemption. With hindsight then, it was obvious that there would have to be a character shift in Brent come the final episodes to secure that redemption, but the way in which it worked was still enormously satisfying and entertaining.

Brent’s realisation that the PR gigs he was doing were pointless (although I suspect in real life the post-modern student union crowd would have embraced him without any of the awkward silences) plus the juxtaposition of his character with Bubble of Big Brother 2 and Howard from the Halifax ads was perfect as far as micro-celebrity goes. It was here that his character began to become a little more self-aware, a through-line continued in the final part of the episode which saw Brent honestly discussing his failings with his blind date at the office Christmas party. Brent’s character has always just wanted to be loved, and I found it to be a truism that when he stopped trying he finally put himself in a situation where that might become possible. In any case, if anyone had missed that point, the scene where he told Finchy to “fuck off” was a wonderful piece of television. It has been said that David Brent is just a wanker but when it came down to it Chris Finch was the real thing (as indeed was Neil, who was positioned here as being properly on Finchy’s wavelength – something Brent aspired to, but never really managed). In contrast it turned out that Brent does in fact have some redeeming qualities after all, and can actually learn from his mistakes. Lovely.

I have a sneaky feeling that there are a lot of people out there who would have been happier if The Office had ended up with a more downbeat, unhappy ending, and that Tim and Dawn getting together was a cop-out. I beg to differ. In my opinion it would have been very easy, and very much expected to leave this storyline unresolved. The twist, then, was that the show chose to do the opposite and move the characters to a place I never thought The Office would go to.

But amongst all this I haven’t yet mentioned whether any of this really made me laugh. It did on several occasions, with a few big belly-laughs and a few quiet chuckles too. I loved the scene where Brent almost leaves the restaurant when he sees his second blind date, or where he tells the overweight woman he was worried that she was his blind date. Like all great comedy (and despite running the risk of being accused of surfing the zeitgeist, I do think it is great comedy) The Office is also good drama. It has a particularly refreshing view of workplace relationships as revealed mainly through Tim’s commentaries which pointed out that you don’t actually truly connect with most of these people you have to spend a huge part of your life with. An observation that must have hit home with many, surely?

Ultimately I found The Office as a whole, and the last episode especially, to be as much about how people treat each other as about making people laugh – and the fact that it also boasted a very un-sitcom level of character development was very satisfying. Basil Fawlty (the character most often compared with Brent) never really changed, or learned from his mistakes, something I have always found enormously frustrating. Similarly, in Only Fools and Horses – which has often been held up as a good example of “dramedy” – Del and Rodney never really changed, they just went through life with things happening to them. As such, The Office has redefined the standard for effective comedy that actually has something to say. It’s shown the competition just how to mix drama, comedy, characterisation and poignancy without becoming too cynical, or mawkish.

]]>
http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?feed=rss2&p=4538 0
The Office http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?p=5228 http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?p=5228#comments Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:00:58 +0000 Chris Diamond http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?p=5228 It would be particularly interesting at this point in time, I think, to be able to flick through some back copies of Radio Times from 1979 and have a gander at what sort of comment the second series of Fawlty Towers was creating around itself. Not having that special retrospective luxury I shall have to merely assert with a blind confidence that I bet it was as nothing compared to the general mania that has surrounded the second series of The Office.

It is difficult to recall the last time a sitcom attracted so much interest in the media. Peter Kay’s recent second series of Phoenix Nights gained a healthy amount of coverage to be sure but, pointedly, pieces on that particular success story almost always managed to include some kind of reference to the first series of The Office. It was as if being broadcast in the same year made it mandatory for the two to be compared against each other, or rather for Phoenix Nights to be held up to comparison with The Office which has somehow managed to become the new gold standard in the genre.

I say somehow, but this is not a part of the inevitable backlash that will surround The Office and its progenitor Ricky Gervaise at some point in the near – probably the very near – future. I enjoyed the first series of the show and have anticipated the second batch of episodes keenly, as have most of the civilised universe, if the press is to be believed. And enjoy the first episode I did but not in the same way that I took to its predecessor last year when it seemed original, smart and relevant as well as funny. The Office series one was an accomplished exercise in character study and dealt well with plot with a good deal of straightforward comedy to hold it together. The Office series two, if the first part is a pointer to the remainder of the run, is to be an exercise in embarrassment more than anything else and it is difficult to see how that can be sustained across six episodes.

Before the programme even began the stage was set as the continuity announcer warned us that we should be prepared to feel the ground swallow us up. We were not to be disappointed on this score as, true enough, I spent much of the show looking at the ceiling, or through my fingers at David Brent – Gervaise’s character – delivering his excruciating speech to the new arrivals in the eponymous office, or trying to wriggle his way out of having told offensive jokes and so on. If this was the object of the programme, as it seemed to be, then it succeeded triumphantly. But is it enough to make a successful comedy out of? To refer back to Fawlty Towers for a moment; it had its fair share of laughs derived from embarrassment, but these nestled comfortably alongside healthy doses of slapstick, barbed one-liners, observations and plain buffoonery to sustain it. The first series of The Office had much of this also, for along with the moments of cringing agony there came the laughs associated with the episodes in the disco and the pub quiz all strung together with a particularly keen sense of observation (or perhaps it is unkind to compare any show to the genius of Fawlty Towers, but the hype rather demands that this show be considered at home amongst such lofty peaks.) None of this broader comedy seemed on offer in the first part of series two.

There seemed to be little sense that any of the characters had developed either, all seemed almost exactly the same. True enough that “in real life” people may remain largely the same but then this is not “real life” and something new is required to maintain interest (even though within the show’s chronology only a period of weeks had elapsed since the end of the first series). The greatest advance in any character was handed to Tim. About to leave office hell at the end of the last series to return to University he seemed to have sold his soul to promotion here in the present day, which was quite a shock as he had been the character the viewer was supposed to actively like from first time around: the sane man in a world gone mad. To see him developed into just another office shit was a surprise and it raised hopes of a new turn for the plot. When would redemption come for Tim? Well, about 10 minutes in when he showed that he was just the same good ol’ fun lovin’ chancer he had always been after all, which was rather a shame.

Meanwhile every other character left over from the first series seemed to be still in exactly the same place – and clothes and haircuts – as when we left them. The stagnation of the players is one thing, the dilapidation of others is something else. Gervaise’s character seems even more idiotic than he was before which begins to present problems of its own. How does someone so patently incompetent and clueless become a senior manager in any kind of firm? Surely that cannot have been Brent’s first time making a speech welcoming a new intake or addressing a gathering of employees? For a show that takes reality as its theme this seems rather anachronistic.

Unfortunately it would appear that the team behind The Office have forgotten much of what made the first show such a success and managed to dismiss the formula that lead to that BAFTA, the possession of which has been trumpeted from the rooftops. Curiously, a show which spawned a million water cooler moments has distilled itself into those moments only and seems to understand itself purely through the recollection of those people who have recounted such moments back to them. It has become a show that does precisely what has been expected of it but nothing more and the expectations are not a true reflection of the actual programme itself. The second series would, so far, appear to be doomed to be a caricature of the first rather than an expansion upon it. Where Phoenix Nights 2 was able to develop a plot across six episodes – admittedly to not quite the effect of the first series – and develop its characters accordingly, The Office has thus far failed in this (although admittedly we’ve only seen one episode so far) and has seen some characters even lapse into cartoons of themselves. Hopefully, now that the characters have been introduced to the army of viewers who were not present first time around, we will see some movement in the right direction over the coming few weeks as it would be a shame to have another original comedy series descend into mediocrity and lend even more ammunition to those tired old lags who would forever have us believe that sitcom is dead.

I’m optimistic, but then I’m also basically just a chilled out entertainer.

]]>
http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?feed=rss2&p=5228 0